We don't have very many reviews of Fitness Factory KC yet.
Have experience with this brand? Join the internet's FAQ and share your review now.
Fitness Factory KC Review
Based on online research and 3 Fitness Factory KC reviews, Fitness Factory KC's overall score is 2.8 out of 5 stars. Fitness Factory KC's review score is based on Fitness Factory KC's customer ratings, its brand popularity, its price competitiveness, as well as the breadth and quality of features it offers to customers. The Fitness Factory KC review table below incorporates summarizes 3 Fitness Factory KC ratings. You can also compare Fitness Factory KC against popular alternatives like Planet Fitness, 24 Hour Fitness and Anytime Fitness. Or you can view the top 50 brands in similar categories, such as health brands, fitness & exercise brands and fitness memberships & class stores.
Brand popularity
Fitness Factory KC Review: Fitness Factory KC Pros & Cons
Fitness Factory KC (fitnessfactorykc.com) is a smaller gym membership which competes against other gyms like Planet Fitness, 24 Hour Fitness, Anytime Fitness, P.volve and PureGym US. Read the full Fitnessfactorykc.com review below for more details.
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
- :
Knoji has 3 Fitness Factory KC reviews and ratings as of June 4, 2026. Knoji editors and the Knoji shopper community have reviewed Fitness Factory KC and compared it against 751 top gym memberships brands, reviewing Fitness Factory KC based on product and store features. Knoji reviews and ranks Fitnessfactorykc.com and other gym memberships based on how many features each offers and based on a 5-star rating scale. Based on these factors and 3 Fitness Factory KC reviews, Fitness Factory KC earns an overall score of 2.8 out of 5.0 points. Fitness Factory KC's review score also factors in its popularity, which is in the mid-range to lower-range compared to competing .
